Compare-Cities.com
Compare Livermore to San Francisco
This post compares Livermore, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Livermore (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 88,232 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $75,750 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $643,200 | $927,400 |
| White | 78% | 47% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 10% | 34% |
| With Kids | 36% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 38 |
| Rentals | 28% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Livermore or San Francisco?
A: Livermore has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 88232 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Livermore or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Livermore.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Livermore or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Livermore.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for Livermore versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Livermore may include: Rancho-Santa-Margarita, Morgan-Hill, and Moorpark.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z