Compare-Cities.com
Compare Livermore to Riverbank
This post compares Livermore, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Livermore (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 88,232 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $75,750 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $643,200 | $247,200 |
| White | 78% | 79% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 10% | 4% |
| With Kids | 36% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 32 |
| Rentals | 28% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Livermore or Riverbank?
A: Livermore has a larger population count than Riverbank: 88232 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Livermore or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Livermore.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Livermore or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Livermore.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverbank does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 28% for Livermore versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Livermore may include: Rancho-Santa-Margarita, Morgan-Hill, and Moorpark.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z