Compare-Cities.com
Compare Livermore to Foster City
This post compares Livermore, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Livermore (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 88,232 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $75,750 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $643,200 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 78% | 43% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 10% | 47% |
| With Kids | 36% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 40 |
| Rentals | 28% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Livermore or Foster City?
A: Livermore has a larger population count than Foster City: 88232 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Livermore or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Livermore.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Livermore or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Livermore.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for Livermore versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Livermore may include: Rancho-Santa-Margarita, Morgan-Hill, and Moorpark.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z