Compare-Cities.com
Compare Livermore to Beverly Hills
This post compares Livermore, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Livermore (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 88,232 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $75,750 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $643,200 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 78% | 82% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 10% | 9% |
| With Kids | 36% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 43 |
| Rentals | 28% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Livermore or Beverly Hills?
A: Livermore has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 88232 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Livermore or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Livermore.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Livermore or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Livermore.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for Livermore versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Livermore may include: Rancho-Santa-Margarita, Morgan-Hill, and Moorpark.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z