Compare-Cities.com
Compare Livermore to Belmont
This post compares Livermore, California to Belmont, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Livermore (city) | Belmont (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 88,232 | 27,110 |
| Income (median) | $75,750 | $107,466 |
| Home Value (median) | $643,200 | $1,174,200 |
| White | 78% | 62% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 10% | 27% |
| With Kids | 36% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
| Rentals | 28% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Livermore or Belmont?
A: Livermore has a larger population count than Belmont: 88232 compared with 27110 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Livermore or in Belmont?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Livermore.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Livermore or Belmont?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Livermore.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Belmont does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for Livermore versus 40% for Belmont.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Livermore may include: Rancho-Santa-Margarita, Morgan-Hill, and Moorpark.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z