Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to Union City
This post compares Lincoln, California to Union City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | Union City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 74,354 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $55,732 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $620,200 |
| White | 81% | 21% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 6% | 53% |
| With Kids | 30% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 38 |
| Rentals | 21% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or Union City?
A: Lincoln has a smaller population count than Union City: 46404 compared with 74354 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in Union City?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or Union City?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Union City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 34% for Union City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z