Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to South San Francisco
This post compares Lincoln, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $697,400 |
| White | 81% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 6% | 39% |
| With Kids | 30% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 39 |
| Rentals | 21% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or South San Francisco?
A: Lincoln has a smaller population count than South San Francisco: 46404 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z