Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to South Pasadena
This post compares Lincoln, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $928,500 |
| White | 81% | 54% |
| Black | 1% | 3% |
| Asian | 6% | 29% |
| With Kids | 30% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 40 |
| Rentals | 21% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or South Pasadena?
A: Lincoln has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 46404 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z