Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to South El Monte
This post compares Lincoln, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $389,400 |
| White | 81% | 59% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 6% | 14% |
| With Kids | 30% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 34 |
| Rentals | 21% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or South El Monte?
A: Lincoln has a larger population count than South El Monte: 46404 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South El Monte does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z