Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to San Francisco
This post compares Lincoln, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $927,400 |
| White | 81% | 47% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 6% | 34% |
| With Kids | 30% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 38 |
| Rentals | 21% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or San Francisco?
A: Lincoln has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 46404 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z