Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to San Bruno
This post compares Lincoln, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $754,700 |
| White | 81% | 49% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 6% | 28% |
| With Kids | 30% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 39 |
| Rentals | 21% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or San Bruno?
A: Lincoln has a similar population count than San Bruno: 46404 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z