Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to Redlands
This post compares Lincoln, California to Redlands, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | Redlands (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 70,765 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $54,151 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $350,900 |
| White | 81% | 71% |
| Black | 1% | 7% |
| Asian | 6% | 7% |
| With Kids | 30% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 35 |
| Rentals | 21% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or Redlands?
A: Lincoln has a smaller population count than Redlands: 46404 compared with 70765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in Redlands?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or Redlands?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redlands does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 42% for Redlands.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z