Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to Pasadena
This post compares Lincoln, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $689,700 |
| White | 81% | 53% |
| Black | 1% | 10% |
| Asian | 6% | 16% |
| With Kids | 30% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 37 |
| Rentals | 21% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or Pasadena?
A: Lincoln has a much smaller population count than Pasadena: 46404 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z