Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to Los Angeles
This post compares Lincoln, California to Los Angeles, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | Los Angeles (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 3,949,776 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $40,932 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $549,800 |
| White | 81% | 52% |
| Black | 1% | 8% |
| Asian | 6% | 11% |
| With Kids | 30% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 35 |
| Rentals | 21% | 63% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or Los Angeles?
A: Lincoln has a much smaller population count than Los Angeles: 46404 compared with 3949776 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in Los Angeles?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or Los Angeles?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Los Angeles does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 63% for Los Angeles.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z