Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to La Verne
This post compares Lincoln, California to La Verne, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | La Verne (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 32,320 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $57,816 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $535,900 |
| White | 81% | 74% |
| Black | 1% | 4% |
| Asian | 6% | 7% |
| With Kids | 30% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 43 |
| Rentals | 21% | 25% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or La Verne?
A: Lincoln has a larger population count than La Verne: 46404 compared with 32320 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in La Verne?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or La Verne?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: La Verne does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 25% for La Verne.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z