Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to Fresno
This post compares Lincoln, California to Fresno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | Fresno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 519,037 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $39,069 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $206,800 |
| White | 81% | 56% |
| Black | 1% | 7% |
| Asian | 6% | 13% |
| With Kids | 30% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 30 |
| Rentals | 21% | 53% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or Fresno?
A: Lincoln has a much smaller population count than Fresno: 46404 compared with 519037 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in Fresno?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or Fresno?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fresno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 53% for Fresno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z