Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to Foster City
This post compares Lincoln, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 81% | 43% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 6% | 47% |
| With Kids | 30% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 40 |
| Rentals | 21% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or Foster City?
A: Lincoln has a larger population count than Foster City: 46404 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z