Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to Foothill Farms
This post compares Lincoln, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $201,200 |
| White | 81% | 67% |
| Black | 1% | 9% |
| Asian | 6% | 5% |
| With Kids | 30% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 33 |
| Rentals | 21% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or Foothill Farms?
A: Lincoln has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 46404 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z