Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to Eureka
This post compares Lincoln, California to Eureka, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | Eureka (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 27,024 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $33,280 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $249,300 |
| White | 81% | 75% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 6% | 7% |
| With Kids | 30% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 37 |
| Rentals | 21% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or Eureka?
A: Lincoln has a larger population count than Eureka: 46404 compared with 27024 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in Eureka?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or Eureka?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 54% for Eureka.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z