Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to Desert Hot Springs
This post compares Lincoln, California to Desert Hot Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | Desert Hot Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 28,298 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $32,379 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $154,600 |
| White | 81% | 70% |
| Black | 1% | 7% |
| Asian | 6% | 2% |
| With Kids | 30% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 34 |
| Rentals | 21% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or Desert Hot Springs?
A: Lincoln has a larger population count than Desert Hot Springs: 46404 compared with 28298 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in Desert Hot Springs?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or Desert Hot Springs?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Desert Hot Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 56% for Desert Hot Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z