Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to Corona
This post compares Lincoln, California to Corona, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | Corona (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 163,585 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $50,094 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $411,600 |
| White | 81% | 66% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 6% | 11% |
| With Kids | 30% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 34 |
| Rentals | 21% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or Corona?
A: Lincoln has a much smaller population count than Corona: 46404 compared with 163585 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in Corona?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or Corona?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Corona does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 35% for Corona.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z