Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to Cathedral City
This post compares Lincoln, California to Cathedral City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | Cathedral City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 53,733 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $33,790 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $232,400 |
| White | 81% | 76% |
| Black | 1% | 3% |
| Asian | 6% | 4% |
| With Kids | 30% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 37 |
| Rentals | 21% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or Cathedral City?
A: Lincoln has a similar population count than Cathedral City: 46404 compared with 53733 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in Cathedral City?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or Cathedral City?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Cathedral City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 39% for Cathedral City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z