Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to Burbank
This post compares Lincoln, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $574,300 |
| White | 81% | 70% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 6% | 11% |
| With Kids | 30% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 39 |
| Rentals | 21% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or Burbank?
A: Lincoln has a much smaller population count than Burbank: 46404 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z