Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to Beverly Hills
This post compares Lincoln, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 81% | 82% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 6% | 9% |
| With Kids | 30% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 43 |
| Rentals | 21% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or Beverly Hills?
A: Lincoln has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 46404 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z