Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to Baldwin Park
This post compares Lincoln, California to Baldwin Park, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | Baldwin Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 76,572 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $31,956 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $357,500 |
| White | 81% | 34% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 6% | 18% |
| With Kids | 30% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 33 |
| Rentals | 21% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or Baldwin Park?
A: Lincoln has a smaller population count than Baldwin Park: 46404 compared with 76572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in Baldwin Park?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or Baldwin Park?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Baldwin Park does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 43% for Baldwin Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z