Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to Bakersfield
This post compares Lincoln, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | Bakersfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 372,680 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $44,447 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $228,400 |
| White | 81% | 68% |
| Black | 1% | 7% |
| Asian | 6% | 7% |
| With Kids | 30% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 30 |
| Rentals | 21% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or Bakersfield?
A: Lincoln has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 46404 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bakersfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z