Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to Altadena
This post compares Lincoln, California to Altadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | Altadena (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 45,236 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $64,923 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $649,800 |
| White | 81% | 53% |
| Black | 1% | 22% |
| Asian | 6% | 6% |
| With Kids | 30% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 43 |
| Rentals | 21% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or Altadena?
A: Lincoln has a similar population count than Altadena: 46404 compared with 45236 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in Altadena?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or Altadena?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Altadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 29% for Altadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z