Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lincoln to Alameda
This post compares Lincoln, California to Alameda, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lincoln (city) | Alameda (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,404 | 78,246 |
| Income (median) | $59,287 | $71,080 |
| Home Value (median) | $389,900 | $729,100 |
| White | 81% | 48% |
| Black | 1% | 7% |
| Asian | 6% | 31% |
| With Kids | 30% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 41 |
| Rentals | 21% | 53% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lincoln or Alameda?
A: Lincoln has a smaller population count than Alameda: 46404 compared with 78246 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lincoln or in Alameda?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Lincoln.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lincoln or Alameda?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lincoln.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Alameda does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 21% for Lincoln versus 53% for Alameda.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lincoln may include: Orcutt, Orangevale, and La-Verne.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z