Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lennox to South San Francisco
This post compares Lennox, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Lennox (CDP) | South San Francisco (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 21,537 | 67,120 |
Income (median) | $27,429 | $52,696 |
Home Value (median) | $371,100 | $697,400 |
White | 45% | 33% |
Black | 2% | 2% |
Asian | 1% | 39% |
With Kids | 55% | 34% |
Age (median) | 29 | 39 |
Rentals | 71% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lennox or South San Francisco?
A: Lennox has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 21537 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lennox or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lennox.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lennox or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lennox.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lennox does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 71% for Lennox versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lennox may include: Huntington-Park, Florence-Graham, and East-Los-Angeles.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z