Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lawndale to South San Francisco
This post compares Lawndale, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lawndale (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,191 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $37,317 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $417,600 | $697,400 |
| White | 42% | 33% |
| Black | 10% | 2% |
| Asian | 10% | 39% |
| With Kids | 39% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 39 |
| Rentals | 67% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lawndale or South San Francisco?
A: Lawndale has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 33191 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lawndale or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Lawndale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lawndale or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lawndale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lawndale does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 67% for Lawndale versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lawndale may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Seaside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z