Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lawndale to South Pasadena
This post compares Lawndale, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lawndale (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,191 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $37,317 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $417,600 | $928,500 |
| White | 42% | 54% |
| Black | 10% | 3% |
| Asian | 10% | 29% |
| With Kids | 39% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 40 |
| Rentals | 67% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lawndale or South Pasadena?
A: Lawndale has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 33191 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lawndale or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lawndale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lawndale or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lawndale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lawndale does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 67% for Lawndale versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lawndale may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Seaside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z