Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lawndale to Fairfield
This post compares Lawndale, California to Fairfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lawndale (city) | Fairfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,191 | 112,790 |
| Income (median) | $37,317 | $51,969 |
| Home Value (median) | $417,600 | $341,500 |
| White | 42% | 46% |
| Black | 10% | 14% |
| Asian | 10% | 17% |
| With Kids | 39% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 34 |
| Rentals | 67% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lawndale or Fairfield?
A: Lawndale has a much smaller population count than Fairfield: 33191 compared with 112790 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lawndale or in Fairfield?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Lawndale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lawndale or Fairfield?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Lawndale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lawndale does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 67% for Lawndale versus 44% for Fairfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lawndale may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Seaside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z