Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lathrop to South San Francisco
This post compares Lathrop, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lathrop (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,050 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $47,279 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $292,900 | $697,400 |
| White | 44% | 33% |
| Black | 6% | 2% |
| Asian | 25% | 39% |
| With Kids | 52% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 39 |
| Rentals | 29% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lathrop or South San Francisco?
A: Lathrop has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 21050 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lathrop or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Lathrop.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lathrop or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lathrop.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Lathrop versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lathrop may include: Vineyard, Eastvale, and American-Canyon.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z