Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lathrop to San Bruno
This post compares Lathrop, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lathrop (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,050 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $47,279 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $292,900 | $754,700 |
| White | 44% | 49% |
| Black | 6% | 1% |
| Asian | 25% | 28% |
| With Kids | 52% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 39 |
| Rentals | 29% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lathrop or San Bruno?
A: Lathrop has a much smaller population count than San Bruno: 21050 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lathrop or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Lathrop.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lathrop or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lathrop.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Lathrop versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lathrop may include: Vineyard, Eastvale, and American-Canyon.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z