Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lathrop to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Lathrop, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lathrop (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,050 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $47,279 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $292,900 | $444,200 |
| White | 44% | 62% |
| Black | 6% | 9% |
| Asian | 25% | 13% |
| With Kids | 52% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 35 |
| Rentals | 29% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lathrop or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Lathrop has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 21050 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lathrop or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Lathrop.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lathrop or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Lathrop.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Rancho Cucamonga does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Lathrop versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lathrop may include: Vineyard, Eastvale, and American-Canyon.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z