Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lathrop to Pasadena
This post compares Lathrop, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lathrop (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,050 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $47,279 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $292,900 | $689,700 |
| White | 44% | 53% |
| Black | 6% | 10% |
| Asian | 25% | 16% |
| With Kids | 52% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 37 |
| Rentals | 29% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lathrop or Pasadena?
A: Lathrop has a much smaller population count than Pasadena: 21050 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lathrop or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Lathrop.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lathrop or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lathrop.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Lathrop versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lathrop may include: Vineyard, Eastvale, and American-Canyon.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z