Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lathrop to Eureka
This post compares Lathrop, California to Eureka, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Lathrop (city) | Eureka (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 21,050 | 27,024 |
Income (median) | $47,279 | $33,280 |
Home Value (median) | $292,900 | $249,300 |
White | 44% | 75% |
Black | 6% | 2% |
Asian | 25% | 7% |
With Kids | 52% | 23% |
Age (median) | 33 | 37 |
Rentals | 29% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lathrop or Eureka?
A: Lathrop has a similar population count than Eureka: 21050 compared with 27024 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lathrop or in Eureka?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lathrop.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lathrop or Eureka?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Lathrop.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Lathrop versus 54% for Eureka.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lathrop may include: Vineyard, Eastvale, and American-Canyon.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z