Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Watsonville
This post compares Lancaster, California to Watsonville, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Watsonville (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 53,452 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $31,969 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $397,900 |
| White | 62% | 55% |
| Black | 21% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 2% |
| With Kids | 42% | 51% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 29 |
| Rentals | 46% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Watsonville?
A: Lancaster has a larger population count than Watsonville: 160113 compared with 53452 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Watsonville?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Watsonville?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Watsonville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 58% for Watsonville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z