Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Wasco
This post compares Lancaster, California to Wasco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Wasco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 26,378 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $31,042 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $155,800 |
| White | 62% | 78% |
| Black | 21% | 6% |
| Asian | 4% | 0% |
| With Kids | 42% | 59% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 28 |
| Rentals | 46% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Wasco?
A: Lancaster has a much larger population count than Wasco: 160113 compared with 26378 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Wasco?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Wasco?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Lancaster versus 45% for Wasco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z