Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Victorville
This post compares Lancaster, California to Victorville, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Victorville (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 121,721 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $39,074 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $177,600 |
| White | 62% | 64% |
| Black | 21% | 16% |
| Asian | 4% | 3% |
| With Kids | 42% | 52% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 29 |
| Rentals | 46% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Victorville?
A: Lancaster has a larger population count than Victorville: 160113 compared with 121721 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Victorville?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Victorville?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Victorville does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Lancaster versus 46% for Victorville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z