Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Union City
This post compares Lancaster, California to Union City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Union City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 74,354 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $55,732 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $620,200 |
| White | 62% | 21% |
| Black | 21% | 5% |
| Asian | 4% | 53% |
| With Kids | 42% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 38 |
| Rentals | 46% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Union City?
A: Lancaster has a larger population count than Union City: 160113 compared with 74354 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Union City?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Union City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 34% for Union City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z