Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Lancaster, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $322,800 |
| White | 62% | 36% |
| Black | 21% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 10% |
| With Kids | 42% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 32 |
| Rentals | 46% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or South San Jose Hills?
A: Lancaster has a much larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 160113 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z