Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to South San Francisco
This post compares Lancaster, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Lancaster (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 160,113 | 67,120 |
Income (median) | $42,993 | $52,696 |
Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $697,400 |
White | 62% | 33% |
Black | 21% | 2% |
Asian | 4% | 39% |
With Kids | 42% | 34% |
Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
Rentals | 46% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or South San Francisco?
A: Lancaster has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 160113 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z