Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to South Pasadena
This post compares Lancaster, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $928,500 |
| White | 62% | 54% |
| Black | 21% | 3% |
| Asian | 4% | 29% |
| With Kids | 42% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 40 |
| Rentals | 46% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or South Pasadena?
A: Lancaster has a much larger population count than South Pasadena: 160113 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z