Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to South El Monte
This post compares Lancaster, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Lancaster (city) | South El Monte (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 160,113 | 20,712 |
Income (median) | $42,993 | $28,039 |
Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $389,400 |
White | 62% | 59% |
Black | 21% | 0% |
Asian | 4% | 14% |
With Kids | 42% | 40% |
Age (median) | 32 | 34 |
Rentals | 46% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or South El Monte?
A: Lancaster has a much larger population count than South El Monte: 160113 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South El Monte does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Lancaster versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z