Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to San Francisco
This post compares Lancaster, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Lancaster (city) | San Francisco (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 160,113 | 864,263 |
Income (median) | $42,993 | $74,841 |
Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $927,400 |
White | 62% | 47% |
Black | 21% | 5% |
Asian | 4% | 34% |
With Kids | 42% | 18% |
Age (median) | 32 | 38 |
Rentals | 46% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or San Francisco?
A: Lancaster has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 160113 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z