Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to San Fernando
This post compares Lancaster, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $370,300 |
| White | 62% | 57% |
| Black | 21% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 1% |
| With Kids | 42% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 33 |
| Rentals | 46% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or San Fernando?
A: Lancaster has a much larger population count than San Fernando: 160113 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Lancaster versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z