Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to San Bruno
This post compares Lancaster, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $754,700 |
| White | 62% | 49% |
| Black | 21% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 28% |
| With Kids | 42% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 46% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or San Bruno?
A: Lancaster has a larger population count than San Bruno: 160113 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Lancaster versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z