Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Riverbank
This post compares Lancaster, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $247,200 |
| White | 62% | 79% |
| Black | 21% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 42% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 32 |
| Rentals | 46% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Riverbank?
A: Lancaster has a much larger population count than Riverbank: 160113 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z