Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Richmond
This post compares Lancaster, California to Richmond, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Richmond (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 108,853 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $42,533 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $371,900 |
| White | 62% | 39% |
| Black | 21% | 20% |
| Asian | 4% | 14% |
| With Kids | 42% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 35 |
| Rentals | 46% | 49% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Richmond?
A: Lancaster has a larger population count than Richmond: 160113 compared with 108853 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Richmond?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Richmond?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Richmond does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Lancaster versus 49% for Richmond.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z